Does vehicle-based delivery of mesenchymal stromal cells give superior results in knee osteoarthritis? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Study design Meta-analysis. Objectives We aim to analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of vehicle-based delivery of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee from Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) available in the literature. Materials and methods We conducted independent and duplicate electronic database searches including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library till August 2021 for RCTs analyzing the efficacy and safety of vehicle-based delivery of MSCs in the management of knee osteoarthritis. Visual Analog Score (VAS) for Pain, Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue(MOCART) score, and adverse events were the outcomes analyzed. Analysis was performed in R-platform using OpenMeta Analyst software. Results 21 studies involving 936 patients were included for analysis. None of the studies made a direct comparison of the direct and vehicle-based delivery of MSCs, hence we pooled the results of all the included studies of both groups and made a comparative analysis of their outcomes. Although at 6 months, both direct and vehicle-based delivery of MSCs showed significantly better VAS improvement (p = 0.002, p = 0.010), it was not consistent at 1 year for the vehicle delivery (p = 0.973). During 6 months and 12 months, direct delivery of MSCs (p {\textless} 0.001, p {\textless} 0.001) outperformed vehicle delivery (p = 0.969, p = 0.922) compared to their control based on WOMAC scores respectively. Both direct (p = 0.713) and vehicle-based delivery (p = 0.123) of MSCs did not produce significant adverse events compared to their controls. Conclusion Our analysis of literature showed that current clinically employed methods of vehicle-based delivery of MSCs such as platelet-rich plasma, hyaluronic acid did not demonstrate superior results compared to direct delivery, concerning the efficacy of treatment measured by improvement in pain, functional outcomes, and safety. Hence, we urge future clinical trials to be conducted to validate the effectiveness of advanced delivery vehicles such as composite bioscaffolds to establish their practical utility in cartilage regeneration with respect to its encouraging in-vitro evidence.