Muthu, Sathish and Corluka, Stipe and Buser, Zorica and Malcolm, James and Luo, Zhuojing and Ambrosio, Luca and Griffoni, Cristiana and Demetriades, Andreas and Dokuzovic, Stjepan and Wu, Yabin and Wang, Jeffrey and Hans-Jorg, Meisel and Yoon, Timothy (2024) Failure rate of decompression-only procedure for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis -Evidence from a PRISMA-compliant systematic review of literature. Global Spine Journal. ISSN 2192-5682
2024-e-posters261.pdf
Download (851kB)
Abstract
Introduction: To identify the failure rates of individual methods of decompression-only procedures to aid in the selection of the best possible method to achieve decompression that works the best in the hands of a given surgeon. Methods: An independent systematic review of four scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, clinicaltrials.gov, Web of Science) was performed to identify relevant articles as per the preferred reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies reporting on failure rates of decompressiononly procedure for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were included for analysis. Analysis was performed using the Open Meta Analyst software. Results: The overall failure rate of decompression-only procedure 9.1\% (95\% CI 6.5, 11.7). Further, open decompression had the highest failure rate of 10.9\% (95\% CI 6.5, 11.7), while micro-endoscopic decompression had the least failure rate of 6.7\% (95\% CI 2.9, 10.6). Similarly, the highest failure of 15.4\% (95\% CI 9.4, 21.4) was noted at 2 years while the least failure of 5.8\% (95\% CI -7.0, 18.6) was noted during the first year following surgery. Single level decompression had a failure rate of 10.5\% (95\% CI 7.1, 13.9), while multi-level decompression recorded a failure rate of 6.2\% (95\% CI 2.8, 9.5). Conclusion: High-quality evidence on the decompression-only procedure for degenerative spondylolisthesis is limited. The decompression-only procedure had an overall failure rate of 9.1\% with open decompression approach resulting in the highest failure rates compared to other minimally invasive approaches.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | AO Spine Meta-analysis Spine Surgery Systematic Reviews |
Divisions: | Orthopaedic Surgery |
Depositing User: | sathish Muthu |
Date Deposited: | 02 Jul 2024 09:29 |
Last Modified: | 02 Jul 2024 09:29 |
URI: | https://ir.orthopaedicresearchgroup.com/id/eprint/273 |