Surgeon Preferences Worldwide in Wound Drain Utilization in Open Lumbar Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Pathologies

Cabrera Cousiño, Juan P. and Gary, Matthew and Muthu, Sathish and Yoon, Shin Won and Kim, Ho-Joong and Cho, Samuel and StipeÄorluka and Lewis, Stephen and Kato, So and Buser, Zorica and Wang, Jeffrey and Hsieh, Patrick (2023) Surgeon Preferences Worldwide in Wound Drain Utilization in Open Lumbar Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Pathologies. Global Spine Journal. pp. 1-10. ISSN 2192-5682

[thumbnail of cabrera-et-al-2023-surgeon-preferences-worldwide-in-wound-drain-utilization-in-open-lumbar-fusion-surgery-for.pdf] Text
cabrera-et-al-2023-surgeon-preferences-worldwide-in-wound-drain-utilization-in-open-lumbar-fusion-surgery-for.pdf

Download (664kB)

Abstract

Study Design Cross-sectional survey. Objective Although literature does not recommend routine wound drain utilization, there is a disconnect between the evidence and clinical practice. This study aims to explore into this controversy and analyze the surgeon preferences related to drain utilization, and the factors influencing drain use and criterion for removal. Methods A survey was distributed to AO Spine members worldwide. Surgeon demographics and factors related to peri-operative drain use in 1 or 2-level open fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative pathologies were collected. Multivariate analyses by drain utilization, and criterion of removal were conducted. Results 231 surgeons participated, including 220 males (95.2%), orthopedics (178, 77.1%), and academic/university-affiliated (114, 49.4%). Most surgeons preferred drain use (186, 80.5%) and subfascial drains (169, 73.2%). Drains were removed based on duration by 52.87% of the surgeons, but 27.7% removed drains based on outputs. On multivariable analysis, significant predictors of drain use were surgeon aged 35-44 (OR = 11.9, 95% CI = 1.2-117.2, P = .034), 45-54 (29.1, 3.1-269.6, P = .003), 55-64 (8.9, 1.4-56.5, .019), and wound closure using coaptive films (6.0, 1.2-29.0, P = .025). Additionally, surgeons from Asia Pacific (OR = 5.19, 95% CI = 1.65-16.38, P = .005), Europe (3.55, 1.22-10.31, P = .020), and Latin America (4.40, 1.09-17.83, .038) were more likely to remove drain based on time duration, but surgeons \textless5 years of experience (10.23, 1.75-59.71, P = .010) were more likely to remove drains based on outputs. Conclusions Most spine surgeons worldwide prefer to place a subfascial wound drain for degenerative open lumbar surgery. The choice for drain placement is associated with the surgeon age and use of coaptive films for wound closure, while the criterion for drain removal is associated with the surgeons region of practice and experience.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Complications
AO Spine
Spine Surgery
Infections
Divisions: Orthopaedic Surgery
Depositing User: sathish Muthu
Date Deposited: 02 Jul 2024 12:57
Last Modified: 02 Jul 2024 14:06
URI: https://ir.orthopaedicresearchgroup.com/id/eprint/310

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item